canirequire › ESM-only › @humanfs/node
Is @humanfs/node ESM-only? Can you require() it?
The Node.js bindings of the humanfs library.
Last verified Sep 9, 2026 against @humanfs/node@0.16.8. Markdown · JSON
ESM-only ESM-only — it has never shipped a CommonJS build
@humanfs/node has been ESM-only since its first stable release; there is no CommonJS version to pin.
require("@humanfs/node") failed in our probe on Node.js 20+ as well; see the runtime table for the error before relying on it. On Node.js 18, which has no require(esm), require("@humanfs/node") fails with ERR_REQUIRE_ESM.
What to do
- require("@humanfs/node") failed in our probe on Node.js 20+ as well; see the runtime table for the error before relying on it.
- From a CommonJS file, use a dynamic import inside an async function: const node = await import("@humanfs/node"). That works on every Node.js version the package supports (>=18.18.0).
- There is no CommonJS release of @humanfs/node to pin; without require(esm) the only option is a dynamic import().
- TypeScript: types are bundled; install nothing extra.
Does @humanfs/node@0.16.8 actually load? Runtime test results
Installed and executed on Sep 9, 2026 with require("@humanfs/node") from a CommonJS file and import "@humanfs/node" from an ES module.
| Runtime | require("@humanfs/node") | import "@humanfs/node" |
|---|---|---|
| Node.js 18 | ✗ failsERR_PACKAGE_PATH_NOT_EXPORTED | ✓ works |
| Node.js 20 | ✗ failsERR_PACKAGE_PATH_NOT_EXPORTED | ✓ works |
| Node.js 22 | ✗ failsERR_PACKAGE_PATH_NOT_EXPORTED | ✓ works |
| Node.js 24 | ✗ failsERR_PACKAGE_PATH_NOT_EXPORTED | ✓ works |
| Node.js 26 | ✗ failsERR_PACKAGE_PATH_NOT_EXPORTED | ✓ works |
| Bun 1.4.0 | ✗ failsError | ✓ works |
How to import @humanfs/node
ES modules (import)
import * as node from "@humanfs/node";Namespace import shown because the ESM entry may have no default export; use named imports for what it exports.
CommonJS (require)
// require("@humanfs/node") failed in our probe on Node.js 20.19+, 22.12+ and newer as well (ERR_PACKAGE_PATH_NOT_EXPORTED); see the runtime table.
// Any Node.js version the package supports (>=18.18.0), from an async function:
async function main() {
const node = await import("@humanfs/node");
}Module format by version
Derived from the type, main and exports fields of every stable release on npm, corrected where a runtime test of that version contradicted them (19 versions; the newest 19 shown).
| Versions | Format | First published |
|---|---|---|
| 0.7.0 – 0.16.8 | ESM-only | Jan 30, 2024 |
Frequently asked
Is @humanfs/node ESM-only?
@humanfs/node@0.16.8 is ESM-only. @humanfs/node has been ESM-only since its first stable release; there is no CommonJS version to pin.
Which version of @humanfs/node still supports CommonJS / require()?
None. @humanfs/node has always been ESM-only. Use import, or a dynamic import("@humanfs/node") from an async function in CommonJS.
How do I use @humanfs/node from a CommonJS file?
From a CommonJS file, use a dynamic import inside an async function: const node = await import("@humanfs/node"). That works on every Node.js version the package supports (>=18.18.0). require("@humanfs/node") failed in our probe on Node.js 20+ as well; see the runtime table for the error before relying on it.
Does @humanfs/node work in Bun?
Yes. import "@humanfs/node" loaded successfully in Bun 1.4.0 on Sep 9, 2026.
Does @humanfs/node ship TypeScript types?
Yes. @humanfs/node bundles its own type declarations; no @types package is needed.
Links
Other esm-only packages
- ansi-styles 7.0.0last CJS
5.2.0 - strip-ansi 7.2.0last CJS
6.0.1 - commander 15.0.0last CJS
14.0.3 - supports-color 11.0.0last CJS
8.1.1 - chalk 6.0.0last CJS
4.1.2 - string-width 8.2.2last CJS
4.2.3 - ansi-regex 6.3.0last CJS
5.0.1 - escape-string-regexp 5.0.0last CJS
4.0.0
Similar popularity
- domhandler 6.0.1ESM-only
- source-map-support 0.5.21CommonJS
- cjs-module-lexer 2.2.1Dual
- @opentelemetry/semantic-conventions 1.43.0CommonJS
- dom-serializer 3.1.1ESM-only
- jsonfile 6.2.1CommonJS
- fast-uri 4.1.4CommonJS
- indent-string 5.0.0ESM-only